The Value of Eco-region Diversity on Land & in the Ocean


Photo: Migratory salmon need many healthy habitats for survival

I just completed a 420 mile round trip to Southern Oregon. Having been born and raised in Northwest Oregon, as well as spending the vast majority of my professional life in this region, it’s easy to forget how diversified the greatest state in the union is. By the way, it is cold and rainy so, no, you do not want to live there, for those considering a move.

Bioregion diversity exhibits incredible opportunity. Admittedly, it is a lot easier to see different bioregions on terrestrial lands than it is in the ocean, but I assure you, they exist underwater as well.

The first thing on my mind when I traveled down to southern Oregon while viewing the scrub oak and myrtle trees is turkey hunting. It was not that long ago that I took up turkey hunting, but I knew as a little kid that it was something that I wanted to do. I will not go into great detail about the surrounding environment; most Oregonians know of the biodiversity and understand the different regions we enjoy across our incredible landscape. What is worth mentioning is that these diverse ecosystems still require protection so that hunters and anglers can reap the benefits these treasures produce.

Most of us that recreate on the ocean tend to pursue some of the more highly migratory species, such as salmon, albacore and halibut. Those species do not have any specific habitat needs in the ocean. Rockfish and lingcod, as well as our favorite crustacean Dungeness crab, all have pretty specific habitat needs. With fairly robust bottomfish populations, it’s hard not to believe that these less frequently pursued but still socially and economically valued rockfish species’ habitat needs are not being met.

As far as habitat goes, we’re just starting to understand how subsurface habitats affect different fish populations. Most marine life exists in coastal habitats. It is a classic example of how the crossing of different bioregions creates animal factories, and how the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems rely upon each other. For example, just as the dead and decaying carcasses of wild salmon bring marine nutrients to interior rainforests, leafy debris, pine needles and of course trees deliver the base forage material for the saltwater environment to slowly consume and pass through its system. What better example of a symbiotic relationship?

Much of our destructive history of commercial fisheries harvest has largely been addressed. Gone are the days of deep-sea trawls that destroyed coral habitats and sensitive rocky reefs. Those were the real fish factories of the past. It was a painful and costly lesson in habitat destruction, not likely to return as a method of harvest ever again. It obviously contributed to the dramatic downsizing of the commercial trawl fleet back in the early 2000’s and didn’t help the already fragile coastal economies that relied on those fisheries. But like the fish themselves, we are a resilient people; we learn from our past mistakes, adapt to the conditions we’ve been dealt, and often move onto other behaviors that also compromise the long-term viability of our working waterfronts.

Although sometimes we get it right. A 1996 revision to our nation’s primary federal fisheries law put in place specific conservation measures following the crash of many species, and more importantly, presented an opportunity to rebuild already depleted stocks of fish. This revision named The Sustainable Fisheries Act of 1996 has a proven track record of fulfilling its objective. Sportanglers have reaped the benefits of this act for the last two decades.

Well, fast-forward to 2017, and it’s certainly going to be a curious Congress for the next reauthorization of our federal fisheries law. Lucky for us West Coasters, our own Pacific Fishery Management Council is pretty forward looking. They have a good track record of conservation-minded measures that promote the long-term sustainability of our fishery resources, but other regions of the country aren’t so lucky.

As with the case on many conservation issues, our work will consist of reaching out to fellow anglers to hear from them about what matters most. I don’t know an angler friend of mine who can’t get behind the future opportunity for the next generation of anglers; we’re just that passionate about our sport. The Magnuson-Stevens Act is about just that, ensuring healthy stocks of fish for the future fishermen of our region. We’re always going to see the ups and downs of our fisheries, but by learning from the mistakes of our past, hopefully, we’ll never see the draconian closures that were required to enable the rebuilding of the crashed stocks of many of our rockfish species. It could be worse, however, because you could live in a state that doesn’t have an ocean.

About Bob Rees

Bob Rees is a professional fishing guide and executive director of the Northwest Guides and Anglers Association.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *